Low Res Powerbook Screens
Posted by: matthew_k
Low Res Powerbook Screens - 27/09/2004 18:43
Perhaps I'm not far enough into the Reality Distortion Field to understand yet, but why can't Apple come out with some high resolution options? I'm considering replacing my Dell 600m and switching to a powerbook, but the screen is the only thing making me hesitate. It's a $50 option on my dell to change the XGA to something more reasonable (1400x1050) when configuring it. The 15" powerbook only comes with a 1280x854 screen. Going that far backwards is going to be hard to stomach, as what I'd really like is a nice UXGA screen.
Matthew
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 27/09/2004 18:46
Presumably some dictated a certain dpi, and that's the one you get, period. Sort of unfortunate.
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 27/09/2004 19:17
This is the exact reason I bought an Intel-based laptop this time around. I got sick of those low resolutions.
Posted by: hybrid8
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 28/09/2004 00:04
IMO, the screen (15.2" widescreen) is not big enough to warrant a higher resolution. The poblem with some Dell systems is that the resolution becomes unusable for practical purposes. For fonts, you end up having to increase the default size of all text, next are window elements. Mac OS X doesn't have a nice global configuration to adjust the DPI of the desktop elements, so this would be even worse on a Mac.
The hardware features, build and ergonomics put the PowerBook far ahead of any Windows machine I could find. Funny as it is, I found some second tier manufacturers, like Acer, Asus and eMachines, to offer far better machines than Dell or Toshiba. Some of the newer IBM systems aren't bad, but none of the big PC names seem to know anything about physically constructing a portable. Every system looks like it was pieced together in an afternoon by parts delivered from 20 other departments that didn't communicate with each other.
If you plan to use the notebook at a desk station, then your external connection options with the PowerBook are also much better than any PC-based model. DVI-I output (that's digital or analog (with adapter) on a single connector) with support for pretty much any standard panel around (extended desktop, sole desktop or mirrored).
Bruno
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 28/09/2004 01:21
Quote:
IMO, the screen (15.2" widescreen) is not big enough to warrant a higher resolution. The poblem with some Dell systems is that the resolution becomes unusable for practical purposes. For fonts, you end up having to increase the default size of all text, next are window elements.
Some of us can see. I'm running 1400x1050 on a 14.1" display, with default font sizes, and I could stand for the resolution to be higher in certain instances, but all in all, it's about right.
Quote:
The hardware features, build and ergonomics put the PowerBook far ahead of any Windows machine I could find.
Apple definitely has this right. I'm reasonably happy with my Sony PCG-Z1WA, but it could use some improvements here and there. And I think that it's probably amongst the best of the Intel laptops as far as this sort of thing goes. The one thing I miss is TV-out built in. Otherwise, I have Firewire, USB, 802.11g, Bluetooth, 10/100 ethernet, and analog VGA out built in. (Plus that stupid MemoryStick thing.) I don't think I'd use DVI out, but it's a feature it doesn't have. It also doesn't have gigabit ethernet, but I never use the wired ethernet anyway. What's the point of a laptop if you've got all these wires coming out of it tying you down?
On the other hand, an equivalent (where equivalent means "had the features I wanted") Apple would have cost a lot more, and still not had good enough resolution for me -- even the 17" Powerbook is only 1440x900, less than the resolution I'm running now.
Posted by: mcomb
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 28/09/2004 04:39
I'd say its a consistency thing. Apple values UI consistency above almost anything else (differences between their annoying metal theme and regular aqua widgets not-withstanding). They want the sizes of icons, text, and images (and even printed output for that matter) to be similar if not the same on all of their systems so they dictate screen resolutions that result in between about 72 and 95 DPI.
I'd like a high res powerbook too (although 1024x768 on my 12inch isn't too bad), but I wouldn't count on apple delivering it unless your willing to hookup an external higher res monitor.
-Mike
Edit: s/rez/res/g to preserve tonyc's sanity
Posted by: matthew_k
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 28/09/2004 20:14
Quote:
Some of us can see. I'm running 1400x1050 on a 14.1" display, with default font sizes, and I could stand for the resolution to be higher in certain instances, but all in all, it's about right.
Exactly. 1400x1050 on a 14.1 display is just about right. I don't want to be able to resolve individual pixels, and I really like being able to see windows behind my non full screened firefox window.
I remember years ago a friend of mine telling me how her brother had driven an hour to san jose and back to buy "this thing that let him make the icons really small". How this day in age "making the icons really small" is apple's worry seems to be the exact opposite of what I'd expect.
An interesting usenet post I found said that classic apps don't have any way to change the resolution, which what what was holding Apple back. I don't know the truth of the matter, as Apple rumors are about a dime a dozen.
Perhaps I'll try and wait for the next powerbook revision before making any decisions, otherwise I'll Be Gettin' A Dell.
Matthew
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 28/09/2004 20:48
Quote:
Quote:
IMO, the screen (15.2" widescreen) is not big enough to warrant a higher resolution. The poblem with some Dell systems is that the resolution becomes unusable for practical purposes. For fonts, you end up having to increase the default size of all text, next are window elements.
Some of us can see. I'm running 1400x1050 on a 14.1" display, with default font sizes, and I could stand for the resolution to be higher in certain instances, but all in all, it's about right.
I agree. The only thing I miss about my Dell was the 15.1" 1600x1200 display.
Certainly not the OS.
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 28/09/2004 20:50
Quote:
How this day in age "making the icons really small"
That's "In this day and age".
Posted by: gbeer
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 03:04
Quote:
I'd say its a consistency thing. Apple values UI consistency above almost anything else
I count that as a plus for Apple.
Posted by: mlord
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 03:07
Viewing my digital photos at 100dpi (1600x1200x15") is way better than the crummy 72dpi resolution (1024x768x14") on most laptops. If the O/S cannot cope with the higher density, then it's time to switch to a better O/S!
Cheers
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 03:09
Quote:
Viewing my digital photos at 100dpi (1600x1200x15") is way better than the crummy 72dpi resolution (1024x768x14") on most laptops. If the O/S cannot cope with the higher density, then it's time to switch to a better O/S!
Cheers
As far as MacOS goes, it can clearly cope: you can tell it to run at 1600x1200 on an external display which is capable of such. They just won't build one into a laptop they'll sell you.
If PearPC were better...
Posted by: drakino
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 04:42
iBook and Powerbook 12 inch: 106 dpi (1024x768)
iBook 14 inch: 91 dpi (1024x768)
Powerbook 15 inch: 101 dpi (1280x854)
Powerbook 17 inch/iMac 17 inch: 100 dpi (1440x900)
Cinema Display 20 inch/iMac 20 inch: 99 dpi (1680x1050)
Cinema Display 23 inch: 98 dpi (1920x1200)
Cinema Display 30 inch: 100dpi (2560x1600)
Very consistant DPI numbers across Apple's LCD lineup except the 14 inch iBook.
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 12:00
That doesn't take into account old Apple laptops, which had similarly sized screens, but lower resolutions. Of course, each iteration may be internally consistent.
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 14:02
Well, here's the real answer:
Macs are cheaper, but gayer
Posted by: hybrid8
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 29/09/2004 22:02
Mark, that's 133 DPI. I don't think there's any argument that viewing photos is going to be better at higher resolution, I just don't see the current PB resolution to be "too low." I would find 1600 to be extreme overkill on my PB's built-in screen. I don't have too much trouble reading small text, but I don't enjoy it. Most sites and material aren't meant to be viewed crammed into a small window with a miniscule font. I'd have to increase default icon sizes and font sizes. And unfortunately, with Mac OS X you only get to pick between two icon sizes for list views. The next release, Tiger, will bring the foundation for resolution independent graphics - it will still be a while before all applications take advantage of this (there won't be any control panel settings suposedly).
Anyway, if ultra-high resolution is a priority for someone, I can see how it would weigh heavily on their choice.
Bruno
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 00:33
Quote:
Mark, that's 133 DPI. I don't think there's any argument that viewing photos is going to be better at higher resolution, I just don't see the current PB resolution to be "too low." I would find 1600 to be extreme overkill on my PB's built-in screen.
9 tiled xterms doesn't work on 1280x754 or whatever.
Well, note that by xterm I mean "the right dimensions", e.g. 80x24 in "fixed" font.
Posted by: matthew_k
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 01:40
Ok, next question -
Who misses their seccond mouse button? I don't use my laptop at a desk, and no one makes a bluetooth trackball. I realize the OS is designed for one mouse button, but that's little consolation when using firefox or photoshop, I assume?
Matthew
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 01:50
In X11, option+button is middle, and command+button is right. Typically Mac apps use control+button as what right click would be in Windows.
Posted by: Roger
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 06:33
Quote:
Who misses their seccond mouse button?
I don't know about missing the second button when using a Mac, since I've not used one much.
I'll tell you this, though -- I sure as hell miss my scroll wheel when I'm forced to use a mouse without one. So I'm pretty sure that I'd miss the second button, too.
On the other hand, it can go too far the other way -- the mouse I've currently got at work has 6 buttons on it (if you include the wheel-click), and I've not used 3 of them yet.
And, as far as resolution goes, as a developer, I need all of the screen real-estate I can get, regardless of physical size. At home, I have two monitors, one 19" at 1600x1200, and a 15" at 1280x1024. If only LCDs were available in those resolutions at that size.
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 11:52
I miss my
third mouse button on virtually any mouse these days. I fear that my last
Logitech MouseMan is about to die. The only appropriate mouse I can find these days is Sun's Crossbow mouse. At least it comes in a USB format -- I may get one of those for home use.
And, yes, I know that you can press the scrollwheel for a third button, but I dislike scrollwheels and it's very hard to press -- too small and too much resistance. In reality, I'd probably dislike scrollwheels less if they didn't supplant the middle button.
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 12:26
Quote:
I miss my third mouse button on virtually any mouse these days. I fear that my last Logitech MouseMan is about to die. The only appropriate mouse I can find these days is Sun's Crossbow mouse. At least it comes in a USB format -- I may get one of those for home use.
And, yes, I know that you can press the scrollwheel for a third button, but I dislike scrollwheels and it's very hard to press -- too small and too much resistance. In reality, I'd probably dislike scrollwheels less if they didn't supplant the middle button.
I could swear I saw a page about modding a microsoft optical 2 button+wheel to be a true 3 button; it's just replacing some plastic.
There's certainly a market for it, at least as a simple kit. Me? I want to retrofit an old DEC VSAAA-XX buck mouse (the 2 wheel kind, not the ball kind).
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 12:27
Quote:
And, as far as resolution goes, as a developer, I need all of the screen real-estate I can get, regardless of physical size. At home, I have two monitors, one 19" at 1600x1200, and a 15" at 1280x1024. If only LCDs were available in those resolutions at that size.
You might have to go to 20" to get 1600x1200 but I know on LCDs of "about" that size I've used it. I don't keep up on 15"ers.
Posted by: tfabris
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 12:40
Quote:
And, yes, I know that you can press the scrollwheel for a third button, but I dislike scrollwheels and it's very hard to press -- too small and too much resistance.
I *like* scroll wheels, but I agree that there is too much resistance for the wheel to double as a third button. I'm far too frequently making the wheel roll when I instead intended to simply press the third button. I'd like to see a good solution.
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 12:52
An obvious solution would be to separate the wheel from the button. Put the wheel more towards the heel of the mouse (away from the cord) or at the tip. Chances are that if you're using the wheel, you're probably not moving the mouse a lot at the same time, so making it slightly harder to reach doesn't seem to be a big deal.
Of course, people make mice for Windows users, where the middle button goes virtually unused. In Unix (or X, really) I use it constantly. It pastes the currently highlighted selection -- swipe with button 1, paste it with button 3.
Posted by: trs24
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 13:38
Hey Bitt, I remember your post about this from before. Have you tried the
labtec 3 button mouse?
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 15:39
I have not, but $5 for a mouse? I'd rather not have to replace it next week.
Posted by: tfabris
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 16:04
On the other hand, it might be merely inexpensive rather than "cheap", and could last you a good long time. And five bucks isn't much to spend to find out.
Posted by: trs24
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 16:33
Well, you could pay $10 for it
here if it would make you feel better.
I haven't tried that mouse myself, so I couldn't speak to it's quality. I'd guess that it's probably not as high quality as your mouseman. It's probably pretty lightweight, but considering the fact that's it's as barebones as one could get with a mouse, I think that the price is probably about right.
EDIT: I just checked Belkin's website and found
this 3 button ps/2 mouse for $10. They also have
a USB version.
Posted by: wfaulk
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 16:47
Hmm. Well, there seem to be more than there used to be. That's heartening.
Posted by: hybrid8
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 19:12
I don't know about the Labiatech mouse, but you can get buttons to spare on any of the new Logitech models. Most of the buttons are positioned in next-to-useless places if you ask me, but the one directly in front of the wheel isn't too bad. Especially if used for something like Paste operations.
I only use 2+ button mice with Mac OS. If I'm using the Powerbook without a mouse, then I'll try and use keyboard shortcuts and controls for as many options as I can remember, and try using the pad and single button as little as possible.
Bruno
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 19:14
Quote:
I don't know about the Labiatech mouse,
Very subtle. Nice.
Posted by: mcomb
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 30/09/2004 21:57
Quote:
I only use 2+ button mice with Mac OS
There is also a bit of software out there that will let you tap the powerbook trackpad as a regular left click and map the trackpad button separately as a right click (or just about anything else). Kinda handy for you two button junkies. If anybody wants it I can dig up a link.
-Mike
Posted by: drakino
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 01/10/2004 01:41
Sidetrack. Drives me insane using a Mac laptop without it, as I use the scroll function on the right edge of mine.
Never really found the need to map a button as a right click, since I can Ctrl-click decently now. Though any time my Powerbook is at a desk, it has a mouse and second monitor attached.
That brings me to my Powerbook gripe. The lack of a right click button is nothing compared to my desire for a dock/port replicator solution from Apple. IE, a special port on the laptop built for such a device, and not third party jobs that are just as much work to attach as plugging in each cable.
Posted by: hybrid8
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 01/10/2004 02:25
Woohoo, cool link. I don't like any of the Windows tap-to-click implementations I've used, but I'd definitely like the scrolling functions. The corner taps may also be very interesting for copy/paste or Expose. The link also lead me to uControl which looks pretty handy - allowing me to disable CAPSLOCK and enable Shift-Delete as a forward delete (Del).
I actually find the PB's seemingly limited keyboard to be a lot nicer in practical usage than those on most other portables. My GF's IBM T41 for instance... Can't disable the tap-click thing and it's got all sorts of extraneous keys for functions that would better be implemented by multi-keys. Not to mention way too many little lights.
I think we've had a little topic creep here.
I don't use my PB with an external display (yet) so the lack of a port replicator isn't an issue. And the mouse is a Logitech X900 (Bluetooth) so there's nothing to connect. Network is wireless, external drives are portable... I don't have anything else I'd need to connect externally that I would also need to leave in place at a desk when the computer is elsewhere.
Bruno
Posted by: Daria
Re: Low Res Powerbook Screens - 01/10/2004 02:30
Quote:
Woohoo, cool link. I don't like any of the Windows tap-to-click implementations I've used, but I'd definitely like the scrolling functions. The corner taps may also be very interesting for copy/paste or Expose. The link also lead me to uControl which looks pretty handy - allowing me to disable CAPSLOCK and enable Shift-Delete as a forward delete (Del).
uControl is sort of flaky on PowerBooks due to the hardware implementation of the keyboard controller. So sometimes my control key (formerly caps lock) becomes a "break my input" key.