Well, I am in a quandry. The positioning of the floating images is determined in em amounts (based on line height), which is relative depending on the browser that is being used. Earlier browsers translate 1em differently than the newer standard-compliant browsers do. The benefit to using em amounts to determine height is that when the text is increased in browsers that support that feature, the floating graphics move down to accomodate the change.

The downside, of course, is that on browsers that mis-translate em size, the graphics appear above or behind other page elements.

An alternative would be to place the floating images based on hard coded amounts, which would pretty much determine correct spacing in almost every browser that is using a default font style, but would be slightly upset when font sizes are increased (i.e., graphics under other page elements).

Which do you think is the lesser of two evils?