#105073 - 14/07/2002 19:15
JEmplode requests/bug...
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
|
Hi,
Since there's a new version to play with, I've found a couple things that I wouldn't mind having modified:
The first is more an annoyance than anything else, but in all the file selection dialog windows, the contents are sorted in the "wrong" order, where "wrong" is defined as "not in the same order they are in my shell". At the moment, directories are listed first, then files. That part is fine. However, the thing that's constantly throwing me off is that files/directories that are named with an upper-case character are sorted in with files named with lower-case letters. Traditionally upper case letters (at least in all the *nix shells I've used) are before all lower-case letters in the sort order. I'd like an option to sort things in that fashion, please.
The second bit is about downloading songs. Can it remove any id3v1 tags, and write the id3v2 tag info from the database, pretty please?
And third, there's a bug in how songs are downloaded: most of my tags specify tracknr in the style "05/14". When I download tracks, I want to have the track number as part of the name so that they list in the proper order in the directory. However, when I added the tracknr to the filename format template, and downloaded a song, I ended up with a directory named "Bob Dylan-Blonde On Blonde-05", and a file in there named "14-I Want You.mp3". The same thing happens if I have a "/" character in the the artist, source, or title fields. The best solution (I think) is to translate any "/" characters into "-" characters, although in the tracknr field, I'd prefer it to ignore the first non-numeric character, and anything trailing it (so I'd just get "05"). Pretty please with a cherry on top?
Cheers,
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105074 - 14/07/2002 20:59
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: canuckInOR]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
1) On the file dialog side, I don't have a whole lot of control here asside from rewriting the entire file dialog ... I'm just using the core Java component which is obviously not using the native dialogs. They did a lot of work on the dialog for JDK 1.4. If you're on a system that has a 1.4 VM, it may be worth upgrading to that to see if it is better.
2) I wanted to get this is for 37(-40) but just didn't have time. The tag writing part of the ID3 library we're using has some bugs still that I need to work out. But this one's pretty high on the list, so it will make it in in the next couple of releases.
3) Someone else asked about ignoring everything past the first non-numeric character. That seems like a pretty reasonable approach to it. The thing that sucks about ID3 tags (maybe some see it as a good thing, I don't know) is that there's no type information enforced -- so fields that you and I think should be numeric just allow random data.... Makes for a pain to interpret it. But I will either put a "-" in (which I need to do to other fields anyway -- like you said about title and artist) and/or make track number better.
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105075 - 14/07/2002 21:13
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
|
1) On the file dialog side, I don't have a whole lot of control here asside from rewriting the entire file dialogDon't go to the trouble on my account, then. I just thought it might be a "quick fix". The KDE file dialog boxes do the same thing, which I never understood, because it's confusing to have one behaviour in the shell and another one in the GUI. 2) I wanted to get this is for 37(-40) but just didn't have time.I thought that might already have been an RFE, but just in case... 3) [...] That seems like a pretty reasonable approach to it.Sweet! I look forward to being able to blow away the MP3's on disk and regenerating them from the empeg... Thanks bunches,
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105076 - 14/07/2002 21:22
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
With regards to number 2, can it please strip all ID3 tags (including multiple V2 tags if present) and then write out a nicely synched set of both a V1 and a V2 tag, the same way MP3 Tag Studio does it?
'Cause right now, that's what I end up doing if I want to write Emplode's data to a downloaded file: I grab the files off the player using Jemplode's file-naming tricks, then make MP3 Tag Studio write a synched V1/V2 tag to the file based on the file names.
The only problem is that Tag Studio doesn't have a field for "Genre" when writing-tags-from-file-names, so then I have to go in and hand-set the genre.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105077 - 14/07/2002 21:40
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: tfabris]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
Yep -- your wish is my command...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105078 - 14/07/2002 22:20
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: canuckInOR]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
The issue with sorting, re: upper/lower case characters, is likely to be a locale issue. IIRC, only the ``C'' locale, which is pretty much just ASCII, sorts all upper case before the lower case characters. If your locale is ``en_US'', for example, you'll see that your sorts will start mixing upper and lower cases together. Your i18n implementation may vary, though. Regardless, Java has made a point of i18n compliance, and I don't think they have anything equivalent to the plain ``C'' locale.
Edit: For example, start up a Korn-type shell (ksh, zsh, bash) and run:LC_ALL=en_US ls in a directory that has files that start with both upper and lower case characters, and you'll see it sort differently. BTW, it bothers me, too. Too many years of expecting it the old way, which is really incorrect.
Edited by wfaulk (14/07/2002 22:22)
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105080 - 15/07/2002 17:42
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 23/09/2000
Posts: 3608
Loc: Minnetonka, MN
|
I wish for riot support
_________________________
Matt
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105081 - 15/07/2002 18:22
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: msaeger]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
I actually don't know anything about the Riot ... Does that use the same protocol as the Empeg or is it a different group inside of SonicBlue? Have they published a protocol spec for it?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105082 - 15/07/2002 18:31
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
It's a different group inside SonicBlue, it does not use the empeg protocols.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105083 - 15/07/2002 18:36
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: tfabris]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
That's too bad ... Those teams should all unify their protocols ... That would be a big savings for SonicBlue I would think. Maybe they will going forward...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105084 - 15/07/2002 18:43
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105085 - 16/07/2002 06:35
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 10/06/1999
Posts: 5916
Loc: Wivenhoe, Essex, UK
|
Gee, ya think?
But that would mean the team empeg would be very busy for a long time, but seemingly producing nothing...
Hmmm
_________________________
Remind me to change my signature to something more interesting someday
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105086 - 16/07/2002 13:43
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: andy]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
Kind of like the government!
-Zeke
_________________________
WWFSMD?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105087 - 16/07/2002 13:59
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Don't get me started.
At long last, I think I may have actually found a job, but it's a long term contract with the NC State Gov't, and they're being extraordinarily poky in passing a budget, which means my job keeps getting pushed back. Aargh!
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105088 - 16/07/2002 17:32
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: canuckInOR]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Import sorting.
I'm working from memory here, so if I'm totally off track on this, just call me on it.
It would be nice if I could get jEmplode to sort on user-defined criteria when you insert new tunes. Right now, unless I'm mistaken, it automatically sorts new tunes based on their filename. If I want them to be sorted by track number, I currently have to get them sorted that way in the list and then click on the ``remember this order''-type button. Since I want them sorted that way 99% of the time, it would be nice if I could make that the default.
I know, you're saying, ``well, why aren't your tracks' filenames in correct alphabetical order?'' and my answer would be that they are, but I have an apparently insane friend who doesn't see the light on that one like you and I do. Regardless, I can see where this might be handy for other applications as well.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105090 - 17/07/2002 06:36
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: wfaulk]
|
old hand
Registered: 30/07/2001
Posts: 1115
Loc: Lochcarron and Edinburgh
|
It'd be really nice if you could set a tag, say "sort" on each playlist to tell jEmplode to keep it sorted by that field or fields. So I could keep my Artists playlist sorted by artist[*], and each artist sorted by year+releasedate.
[*] I use the artist field on such playlists to store a surname-first version of the name, for sorting purposes.
_________________________
Toby Speight 030103016 (80GB Mk2a, blue) 030102806 (0GB Mk2a, blue)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105091 - 17/07/2002 07:05
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: tms13]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
|
I was planning on implementing this in emplode using scripting, so you'd just define a pre-sync or post-import hook function that did this.
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105092 - 17/07/2002 07:37
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Roger]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 62
Loc: MA
|
Has anyone had a problem with advanced searches? FIrst of all if I just type marked and search nothing comes up. I know tracks are marked because i sorted the All Tracks view by marked files. Also I typed in a string and tried to save the advanced search however I didn't come up under the searches folder in the main view. Any ideas?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105093 - 17/07/2002 16:48
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Squawkt22]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105094 - 17/07/2002 16:50
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Roger]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
So is Emplode used for other Rio products? i.e. Eventually will there be a really cool new version released? Or is it pretty much "dead" with Empeg?
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105095 - 17/07/2002 23:23
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
|
So far, only the Rio Central.
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105096 - 17/07/2002 23:26
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
|
Ah, so it's not compatible with emplode, then?
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105097 - 17/07/2002 23:34
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I still can't get advanced searches to work on my Linux box, although I no longer get an exception when I try. (For example, ``marked = true'' doesn't work. Nor does ``marked=true'' or ``marked''.) Maybe I'm doing something wrong. Can you give me a correct example? (Standard searches seem to work fine.)
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105098 - 17/07/2002 23:52
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Roger]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
Emplode supports that, huh? It's back to the drawing board a bit on the parser, then...
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105099 - 17/07/2002 23:55
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: wfaulk]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
DOH! I suck .. I led you on a wild goose chase ... I forgot that internally "marked" turns into values "Yes" or "No" and I don't have a filter on that field to convert it to a Java boolean (i.e. "true" or "false").
so do
marked = Yes
Note the capital Y. I'll get this worked out... Roger has rubbed it in that Emplode can do "marked", so in the name of American pride, I too must support that.
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105100 - 18/07/2002 06:42
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 62
Loc: MA
|
Bingo, the capital Y wored. Thanks!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105101 - 19/07/2002 00:37
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 18/01/2000
Posts: 5683
Loc: London, UK
|
The rules for emplode are that an empty string evaluates to false. Anything else evaluates to true. We set marked to "yes" or to "".
_________________________
-- roger
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105102 - 19/07/2002 07:20
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Roger]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 62
Loc: MA
|
I am also having a bug when trying to autoupdate hijack with Jemplode. I open the database and then get this error:
at java.net.URL.<init>(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URL.<init>(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URL.<init>(Unknown Source)
at org.jempegjempeg.util.HijackVersionTracker.findLatestRelease(HijackVersionTracker.java:308)
at org.jempeg.empeg.util.HijackVersionTracker.isNewerVersionAvailable(HijackVersionTracker.java:308)
at org.jempeg.empeg.util.VersionTrackerUtils.upgrade(VersionTrackerUtils.java:46)
at org.jempeg.empeg.util.VersionTrackerUtils.upgrade(VersionTrackerUtils.java:26)
at org.jempeg.empeg.util.VersionTrackerUtils.upgrade(VersionTrackerUtils.java:18)
at org.jempeg.empeg.emplode.EmplodeConnection Manager$InitFromConnectionRunnable.run(EmplodeConnectionManager.java:133)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Damn that took forever to type. Any ideas? TIA
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105103 - 19/07/2002 07:25
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Squawkt22]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
you typed all that? You can't copy and paste it? What a pain ... Sadly, though, you're missing the very top part which actually tells what the exception was
I would check your options and make sure the URL to Hijack is configured properly. You can remove .jempegrc in your home directory to have all the options regenerated.
The correct values are:
Hijack URL: http://empeg-hijack.sourceforge.net
Hijack Mk Version: mk2
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105104 - 19/07/2002 07:39
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 62
Loc: MA
|
Well I found out the problem. My stupid ass must have deleted the URL to hijack. Dude, are you f$%^ this up? You are being very undude... Anyways, thanks for the help.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105105 - 19/07/2002 07:42
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Squawkt22]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
Still though, jEmplode responded in a pretty retarded way ... If you have a blank URL, and it has a default value, ti should just go back to the default. At least it should handle it better than it did.
ms
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105106 - 23/07/2002 10:35
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 62
Loc: MA
|
I'm not sure if this is a bug what, but its weird. When I mirror the Artists/Album soup, the positions all change. This isn't cool because when I want to listen to an album in a particular order it isn't in the correct order.
Edit: Just checked it out some more, it seems that the mirror sets the order according the track name. It alphabetizes then sets the order.
Edited by Squawkt22 (23/07/2002 10:38)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105107 - 23/07/2002 10:47
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: Squawkt22]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 09/09/2000
Posts: 2303
Loc: Richmond, VA
|
Just pretend 41 never existed and mirroring isn't supported. I'm rewriting it. Such is the life of the prerelease.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#105108 - 23/07/2002 13:00
Re: JEmplode requests/bug...
[Re: mschrag]
|
journeyman
Registered: 09/03/2002
Posts: 62
Loc: MA
|
Hehe, don't worry, it still works pretty well. You are doing an excellent job. I'm just happy you finally got the soop mirroring.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|