#258934 - 24/06/2005 14:03
Question about silent mp3's...
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
I want to have as long (minutes of playing time) an mp3 as will fit on a standard 700MB CD-R. The rub is that I want this mp3 to be silent - no audio information at all. I just want it to play silence for as long as possible.
I'm assuming I'll be able to make an arbitrarily long silent .wav file as a source.
This leaves two questions, how do I compress this .wav file for maximum data density (longest play time)? Secondly once I know how to encode the .wav file, how long must it be pre-encoding to fit (within a few MB) on an 700 MB CD?
An odd request, but here's the why of it:
The 2005 Subaru Legacy/Outback has a nastily integrated stock stereo with no AUX input. People have figured out how to hardware hack line level into the CD audio path. This requires playing a silent CD while really playing your Aux source. My Outback has the stereo with MP3 capability, so I want to have as long a CD as possible. The non-MP3 head units mute briefly every 72 minutes as the CD mechanism repeats. I want to maximize the time between these brief mutes by using a hyper long silent MP3 track.
Thoughts?
-Zeke
_________________________
WWFSMD?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258935 - 24/06/2005 14:34
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
You'd get that by using the lowest possible bitrate in mono. For MP3, that'd be 32kbps. You're interested in the amount of time that would fit in 700MB. That's 179,200 seconds or 2986 minutes and 40 seconds, or 49 hours, 46 minutes, and 40 seconds.
You probably can't actually fit 700MB on a CD, so I'd chop it down a little to make sure you can fit it all there. Even if you call it 24 hours, you'd probably be fine, unless you're a trucker and have a lot of crank.
Just make sure to tell your encoder to do 32kbps CBR in mono. I doubt that your stereo will have a problem with the 32kbps, but it might have a problem with mono. If it can't do mono for some reason, tell your encoder to do joint stereo. You'll probably get nearly as much room as mono. Again, 24 hours should fit and be more than enough.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258936 - 24/06/2005 14:41
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Very odd hack... Hmm.
I guess the obvious thing is you want the bitrate of the MP3 to be very low. LAME seems to only want to go as low as 32 kbps with MP3, but will go lower (down to 8) with MPEG-2 and MPEG-2.5 . Assuming your MP3CD player is happy with those formats, you might try one of them.
I wouldn't bother with WAV files. LAME can take raw PCM data as input, so I'd just create a file full of all zeroes (use dd on linux, or whatever on Windows) and see how LAME does with that. I don't know for sure that encoding complete silence is lossless (i.e. it won't introduce any artifacts) but if it did, I'd be surprised.
So, now to your question of how long the input file should be... Well, that's trial and error. To lessen the size of the file you'll have to create, you can probably give LAME a sampling frequency argument, -s, which I think only goes down to 8 Khz.
Experimenting with this a little, I have a 100MB file of all zeroes here, and encoding it with this command line, I get a 53 minute MP3 that's only about 12MB in size:
lame -b 32 -s 8 foo.pcm foo.mp3
So, I guess you could fit about 50 of those on a CD-R, so that's around 44 hours... Seems long enough...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258937 - 24/06/2005 16:07
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Quote: People have figured out how to hardware hack line level into the CD audio path. This requires playing a silent CD
Heh, I did this once, to hack a boom-box CD so that it's CD output became its aux input. Fortunately, I was able to use any old CD, not just a silent one. But I see your issue.
My concern wouldn't be for the length of time you could fit on the CD, it would be wondering what the largest MP3 file that its poor little stock stereo could handle. I'll bet it won't play a 700 meg MP3.
I think what you should do is ballpark the amount of time your car can drive continuously on the highway between gas station stops, make an ordinary silent wave file of that length (perhaps a bit longer), and encode that. See if it'll even play that.
(Logic behind this: You don't need a 900-hour-long wave file because, even at the longest, the car is gonna have to stop for gas at some point.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258938 - 24/06/2005 16:23
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 27/06/1999
Posts: 7058
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Well, I was bored after lunch and before a 2 hour meeting today, so here ya go. Attached is a 12k tar.bz2 archive which will expand to a 610 MB silent MP3 file that runs for 44 hours. It was a fun experiment in compression, to say the least... 4.8 GB all-zeroes PCM file compresses to a 610MB MP3 compresses to a 12k bzip2 archive. Fun stuff!
Anyway, give it a shot...
Attachments
258507-foo.tar.bz2 (49 downloads)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258939 - 24/06/2005 17:17
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: tonyc]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
I love it. You can post a file to the BBS that decompresses to fill an entire CD. I'd be interested in knowing if that stock stereo will even play the file.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258940 - 24/06/2005 17:47
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: tfabris]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
Tony F - Yeah, the reason I have to use a blank CD is that it's a CD changer, and I don't really want to break the ability to play CD's. I figure I'll try a really big .mp3 and see if it chokes. I know I can't have >999 tracks in any given folder, but it said nothing about file length. We'll see. Quote: unless you're a trucker and have a lot of crank.
ROFMLAO!
Tony C - Encoding now...thanks for the command line text & zero file idea, much quicker than I would have managed. I managed to max out my RAM using UltraEdit (2GB, never enough...). Encoding will take a while for my 2.1GB .pcm file.
_________________________
WWFSMD?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258941 - 24/06/2005 17:50
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: tonyc]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 25/08/2000
Posts: 2413
Loc: NH USA
|
Edited by Ezekiel (24/06/2005 18:09)
_________________________
WWFSMD?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258942 - 24/06/2005 19:09
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: Ezekiel]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
If silence is golden, that is a lot of coin!
I would be curious to see if there were any compression artifacts. It should have been an easy compression, but that would be an interesting way to test it.
_________________________
Paul Grzelak 200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258943 - 24/06/2005 20:16
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: pgrzelak]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 20/12/1999
Posts: 31597
Loc: Seattle, WA
|
Quote: I would be curious to see if there were any compression artifacts.
If you've ever looked at an MP3 file that contains silence (say, if there'a a fade in or fade out to or from silence) in a binary editor before, you'll see that silent frames are filled with FF's. In other words, every sample is exactly the same, i.e., silent. So true silence in the source file should theoretically translate to true silence in the encoded file.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#258944 - 25/06/2005 17:31
Re: Question about silent mp3's...
[Re: tfabris]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 15/08/2000
Posts: 4859
Loc: New Jersey, USA
|
Cool!
_________________________
Paul Grzelak 200GB with 48MB RAM, Illuminated Buttons and Digital Outputs
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|