As I've said before, you might be right, but that's a bizarre gamble. If it becomes codified (and therefore not a gamble), then it's just contracting under a different name. So I'm not sure what the issue is, other than it potentially bypasses the non-religious clause the government has for funding such organizations, but that's effectively gone now anyway.

And, despite the possible inference, I'd much rather there be someone down there handing out food and Bibles than there be no one down there handing out anything at all.