#131217 - 17/12/2002 10:28
Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
I'm a new Mac convert with some frustrations about what do use for audio extraction and encoding. In the PC world I used EAC with LAME as the external encoder. Can Anyone recommend something that will get me the same or better results?
Thanks!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131218 - 17/12/2002 10:36
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 24/04/2002
Posts: 305
Loc: Germany
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131219 - 17/12/2002 10:38
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: 303]
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
So far I am NOT an iTunes fan. I had it add stuff to my library and it reorganized all my folders so now my folder structure that I just downloaded from my Empeg is NOT the same any more. Now I'll have to manually fix my folders.
I'm also not happy with iTunes because apparently it cannot properly identify the bit rate or time of the songs though just about every other mp3 player out there does correctly.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131220 - 17/12/2002 10:51
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I don't really like iTunes either. What I generally do when forced to use my Mac to rip is to use iTunes to extract to WAV, then use a command line lame to encode it. You might be able to find an easier to use ripper over at VersionTracker, though. I haven't looked that hard for one.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131221 - 17/12/2002 10:56
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: wfaulk]
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
What player do you use for OS X then? I don't always have the luxury of the Empeg sitting next to me or I'd stream off the web server from it.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131222 - 17/12/2002 11:23
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
I honestly haven't found a good one.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131223 - 17/12/2002 12:44
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
addict
Registered: 05/05/2000
Posts: 623
Loc: Cambridge
|
> it reorganized all my folders
That's an option in the preferences - 'keep music folder organised' or somesuch. IIRC, it's not on by default.
I'm not much of an iTunes fan either, but it's probably the best media player for OS X at the moment. It could be worse - Apple could have signed up Real to supply the media player. *shudder*
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131224 - 17/12/2002 13:31
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: David]
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
OK, I found two promising programs that I need to mess with then compare to my PC EAC/Lame combination.
They are called AudioCDRescue (does multiple passes like EAC)
and then using iTunes-Lame MP3 encoder.
Gonna try them tonight I hope.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131225 - 17/12/2002 16:18
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: 31/08/1999
Posts: 1649
Loc: San Carlos, CA
|
You might also want to check out Audion from www.panic.com. It is commercial (although relatively cheap), but is supposed to be able to use lame for encoding. I haven't used it in a while myself though as I am generally happy enough with iTunes.
-Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131226 - 20/12/2002 16:18
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
stranger
Registered: 04/02/2002
Posts: 48
Loc: Denver, Colorado
|
That's odd that iTunes can't get the bit rate or times correctly.
SoundJam MP has no problems and is the predessor to iTunes.
I still use SoundJam. You just drag you files to it and it uses them where they are, no Library.
BTW SoundJam is No Longer Available, as they sold it to Apple as the basis for iTunes and Apple killed it.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131227 - 20/12/2002 17:54
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: ADent]
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
I'm now looking for Python which is a cross-platform *nix variant that if it works is suppose to be a front end to LAME. All of the other front ends I've tried are either too cumbersome or simply do not support Dabrom's presets. Barring a miracle that I actually find something I'll be on a search for Virtual PC 6.0 though the idea of shelling out a couple hundred bites particuarly when most of the money you pay goes towards the OS as well as the program and I already own a legit copy of Win XP Pro.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131228 - 20/12/2002 19:40
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
You can get Virtual PC w/ DOS, which effectively is Virtual PC with no OS. It's about $90-$120 cheaper.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131229 - 21/12/2002 04:05
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: wfaulk]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 24/04/2002
Posts: 305
Loc: Germany
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131230 - 22/12/2002 11:45
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: wfaulk]
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
I'm attempting to find people who have used EAC and LAME in Windows via Virtual PC for MAC to find out if it was too CPU costly and affected the MAC too greatly or not.
If it taxes the CPU too much, my final option is to get a barebones PC, install the few things I need on it, then connect to it via Remote Desktop for Mac (Microsoft makes a Mac OS X version) and run it that way. I know it would be faster than Virtual PC but the hardware overhead is greater and the cost is more.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131231 - 22/12/2002 12:20
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
EAC won't work in Virtual PC. VPC doesn't emulate the CDROM well enough to pass the low level information properly.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131232 - 22/12/2002 13:51
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: wfaulk]
|
stranger
Registered: 24/07/2002
Posts: 37
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
|
Thank you for saving me the bother of buying the software then. I'll have to go with a bare bones PC running Windows and Remote Desktop for Mac (I'll initially go with Ethernet until the Mac Kernel for TCP/IP Over Firewire is finished (right now it's in developmental mode).
Any suggestions for a barebones setup will be most appreciated. Plan on having it run either Win 2K or XP Pro as I have both.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131233 - 25/02/2003 02:58
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
enthusiast
Registered: 24/04/2002
Posts: 305
Loc: Germany
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131234 - 25/02/2003 16:39
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: 303]
|
old hand
Registered: 20/03/2002
Posts: 729
Loc: Palo Alto, CA
|
I'm also not happy with iTunes because apparently it cannot properly identify the bit rate or time of the songs Do you mean while you're streaming? I had this problem, too, with iTunes 2.x but they seem to have fixed that problem in iTunes 3. When I stream from iTunes at home is seems to behave exactly the same way that WinAmp 3 does for me at work.
- trs
_________________________
- trs
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131235 - 16/02/2004 07:40
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: Xpyder]
|
member
Registered: 30/04/2003
Posts: 136
Loc: United Kingdom
|
You could try using LameBrain. I've done thousands of songs with it and it is more flexible in terms of filenaming and location etc than iTunes, although maybe not as 'accurate' as EAC (just a guess).
As for the genreal comments about iTunes, I can't see how anyone cannot agree it's the best music organiser available. I've tried all sorts on my Mac, WinXP and Linux machines and quite frankly they ALL SUCK. iTunes is way better, hands down.
It cannot (by default) do Lame encoding, but there's ways around that and it's organisational abilities are unsurpassed. Not perfect by any means, but nothing else comes close.
Forget (J)emp(plode/tool). In my experience they all have MAJOR problems that iTunes simply doesn't have. What we now need is the iTunes to empeg plugin so iTunes is the front end for the empeg, as for an iPod. That would be GREAT.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#131236 - 16/02/2004 11:15
Re: Mac OS X Extraction and Encording
[Re: ukengb]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
I can't see how anyone cannot agree it's the best music organiser available.
Lack of hierarchical or deep playlists.
What we now need is the iTunes to empeg plugin so iTunes is the front end for the empeg, as for an iPod. That would be GREAT.
If I could keep my existing slaved over structure of the empeg on my computer, I might actually listen to music more often off a computer, and have a desire for such a syncing program. But again, with the lack of hierarchical playlists is what keeps me ripping music on the computer, sending it to the empeg, then archiving it to CD or DVD media.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|