Hi Sean.
With a drive that supports error detection (C2), EAC should not be any slower or otherwise minor to Audiograbber, but way superior when it comes to making exact grabs on scratched discs. Effectively, EAC 0.9pb7 is about 2-3% slower than AudioGrabber on a new disc, and about 50% slower on a severely scratched one. However, AudioGrabber produces different results on each run on that scratched disc, while EAC always produces the same result. While I can live with the slowdown on new discs, I certainly canīt live with damaged grabs like AG produces on scratched discs.
cu,
sven
_________________________
proud owner of MkII 40GB & MkIIa 60GB both lit by God and HiJacked by Lord