#292601 - 22/01/2007 04:45
JEmplode and OSX
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Not that it took much doing, but I repackaged JEmplode as a standard OSX application bundle, so that I could have a decent looking icon when I'm running it, rather than having to look at the crappy standard .jar icon in my dock. If anyone else wants it, just let me know.
Attachments
293415-JEmplode.zip (51 downloads)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#292602 - 22/01/2007 10:37
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: webroach]
|
addict
Registered: 02/08/2004
Posts: 434
Loc: Helsinki, Finland
|
Sounds great! I'm just about finished migrating to OSX, so your project came along just at the right time! Thanks.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292603 - 22/01/2007 14:53
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: petteri]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
Sounds great! I'm just about finished migrating to OSX, so your project came along just at the right time! Thanks.
You're welcome, but it's really not much of a project. It probably took all of 10 minutes, but you have to have the developer tools (to repackage it, not to use it).
When you want a copy, just let me know, and I can email it to you. In total it's about 2MB.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292604 - 22/01/2007 17:41
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 23/08/2000
Posts: 3826
Loc: SLC, UT, USA
|
Me wanty!
loren at skivvies dot com
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292605 - 22/01/2007 17:47
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 25/12/2000
Posts: 16706
Loc: Raleigh, NC US
|
Quote:
you have to have the developer tools (to repackage it
Actually, as I remember, it just a series of directories with an image in one of them. You don't need the developers tools if you just remember the structure. But I could be wrong.
_________________________
Bitt Faulk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292606 - 22/01/2007 19:03
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
I haven't done this recently, but in the past I just grabbed the old "jEmpeg 2.0" files from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=12943 then did a "Show Package Content" on the app it included to replace the .jar file inside. As far as hosting yours, it may be small enough to be attached to this thread.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292607 - 22/01/2007 22:16
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: wfaulk]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
Quote:
you have to have the developer tools (to repackage it
Actually, as I remember, it just a series of directories with an image in one of them. You don't need the developers tools if you just remember the structure. But I could be wrong.
I think you could do it like that, but by going the developer tool direction, the builder automatically adds the stub files, plist files, etc.
Those who have asked for it should have it in their inbox as we speak. Please let me know if there are any problems.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292608 - 22/01/2007 22:17
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: drakino]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
I haven't done this recently, but in the past I just grabbed the old "jEmpeg 2.0" files from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=12943 then did a "Show Package Content" on the app it included to replace the .jar file inside.
As far as hosting yours, it may be small enough to be attached to this thread.
I didn't think it'd work...the package is like 1.8MB.
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292609 - 23/01/2007 00:27
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 08/06/1999
Posts: 7868
|
From the post preview/attachment screen:
You may attach a file if you like (no bigger than 10000000 bytes please).
Thats about a 9.5mb limit right now.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292610 - 23/01/2007 02:07
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: drakino]
|
old hand
Registered: 23/07/2003
Posts: 869
Loc: Colorado
|
Quote:
From the post preview/attachment screen:
You may attach a file if you like (no bigger than 10000000 bytes please).
Thats about a 9.5mb limit right now.
Ok, nice! I edited the original post to add a ZIP file of the app as an attachment.
I never noticed that we could add an attachment so large. Has it always been like that?
_________________________
Dave
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#292611 - 23/01/2007 04:36
Re: JEmplode and OSX
[Re: webroach]
|
carpal tunnel
Registered: 13/02/2002
Posts: 3212
Loc: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
I never noticed that we could add an attachment so large. Has it always been like that?
No... it used to be much smaller than that. There were cases in the past of people not being able to attach something due to the size.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index