speed of netatalk vs smb? | Off Topic | unofficial empeg BBS

Quick Links: Empeg FAQ | RioCar.Org | Hijack | BigDisk Builder | jEmplode | emphatic
Repairs: Repairs

You are not logged in. [Log In] empegbbs.com » Forums » General Discussion » Off Topic » speed of netatalk vs smb?

Topic Options

#328415 - 04/01/2010 02:23 speed of netatalk vs smb?
gbeer carpal tunnel Registered: 17/12/2000 Posts: 2665 Loc: Manteca, California	Should I expect the transmission rate of a large file to be the same when it is sent to a samba shared folder vs. when it is sent to a folder shared via netatalk? File sent to smb share goes at about 4MB/sec. File sent via netatalk transfers at about 10MB/sec. The 10MB/sec number seems reasonable because the MBP is connecting via wireless at 130mb/s. _________________________ Glenn
Top

#328416 - 04/01/2010 02:32 Re: speed of netatalk vs smb? [Re: gbeer]
hybrid8 carpal tunnel Registered: 12/11/2001 Posts: 7738 Loc: Toronto, CANADA	My MBP wireless file copy speeds can be at or over 10MB/s to an SMB share when I am in clear line of site and relatively close (in the same room, 8 feet away) from the base station. I can't speculate why you're seeing less than half the rate from SMB. _________________________ Bruno Twisted Melon : Fine Mac OS Software
Top

#328423 - 04/01/2010 12:16 Re: speed of netatalk vs smb? [Re: hybrid8]
peter carpal tunnel Registered: 13/07/2000 Posts: 4181 Loc: Cambridge, England	What's the server? SMB does impose more load on the server than Appletalk does, and if the server is a slightly feeble ARM-based NAS then it might be significant. When I worked at ANT, with all RiscOS clients and all Windows servers, we still used Appletalk -- a protocol native to neither client nor server -- for file sharing, as it was the fastest. Peter
Top

#328439 - 04/01/2010 18:53 Re: speed of netatalk vs smb? [Re: peter]
gbeer carpal tunnel Registered: 17/12/2000 Posts: 2665 Loc: Manteca, California	Originally Posted By: peter What's the server? SMB does impose more load on the server than Appletalk does, and if the server is a slightly feeble ARM-based NAS then it might be significant. When I worked at ANT, with all RiscOS clients and all Windows servers, we still used Appletalk -- a protocol native to neither client nor server -- for file sharing, as it was the fastest. Peter Weak would describe this server, it's one of these running Ubuntu. Edited by gbeer (04/01/2010 18:54) _________________________ Glenn
Top

View All Topics