I thought the logic was:
1.0 - first mainstream release
1.0x - minor bug fixes
1.1 - major restructuring and product polishing
1.x - additional revisions and fine tuning, feature adding
2.0 - VR added
2.0x - minor bug fixes
2.x - major revisions
... ...
does this not seem right?
Or you could conform to current M$ initiated trends and call it empegcar 2001, 2003 etc
Murray 06000047
I don't think, therefore I am not.
_________________________
--
Murray
I What part of 'no' don't you understand?
Is it the 'N', or the 'Zero'?